论文部分内容阅读
目的:检验中国军官职业人格量表(the Military Officer Vocational Personality Scale,MOVPS)的结构效度和效标关联效度。方法:1547名现役军官、215名士兵和83名公务员完成了MOVPS的测试,104名和99名军官在完成MOVPS的同时,分别完成了EPQ和MBTI的测试。结果:一阶因子、二阶因子分与总量表分的相关系数为0.334-0.779(P<0.001);所有一阶因子与其相应的二阶因子相关均较高(0.585-0.819),而与其它二阶因子相关均较低(0.009-0.284);由武德才能、人际自我组成的两因子模型拟合最优(χ2/df<5,RMSEA<0.08,RMR<0.04,其余各指标除了AGFI略低外,均≥0.90);一阶因子、二阶因子和总量表分与艾森克人格问卷之间相关达0.05水平的因子数共31个,占相关总数目的51.7%;一阶因子、二阶因子和总量表分与麦尔-布瑞格斯人格类型量表之间相关达0.05水平的因子数共18个,占相关总数目的30.0%;军官与士兵、公务员的MOVPS得分存在显著差异。结论:MOVPS结构合理,可以应用于中国军官的心理教育、训练、评估和选拔实践。
Objective: To test the validity of validity and validity of the military officer vocational personality scale (MOVPS). Methods: 1547 active duty officers, 215 soldiers and 83 civil servants completed the MOVPS test. 104 and 99 officers finished the EPQ and MBTI tests while completing MOVPS. Results: The correlation coefficients of first order factor, second order factor and total score were 0.334-0.779 (P <0.001). All the first order factors were correlated with their corresponding second order factors (0.585-0.819) (Χ2 / df <5, RMSEA <0.08, RMR <0.04). The rest of the indicators except AGFI Slightly lower than that of the control group, both ≥0.90). The first-order, second-order and total-scale scores were associated with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire with a total of 31 related factors of 0.05, accounting for 51.7% of the total. , Second-order factors and total score and Myer-Briggs personality type scale correlation of 0.05 level of the number of factors a total of 18, accounting for 30.0% of the total number of related; officers and soldiers, civil servants, the existence of MOVPS score Significant differences. Conclusion: MOVPS is reasonable in structure and can be applied to the psychological education, training, evaluation and selection of Chinese military officers.