论文部分内容阅读
多年来,对于《专利法》第四十七条中有关宣告专利权无效的决定对之前已作出并执行的专利侵权的司法判决、裁定不具有追溯力的规定,业界一直存在着各种不同的理解。本文对近两年来最高人民法院作出的相关判决和裁定进行了梳理,对最高人民法院就《专利法》第四十七条规定的相关释义及其法律适用的最新观点作出介绍和解读。《专利法》第四十七条第一款规定:“宣告无效的专利权视为自始即不存在。”第四十七条第二款规定:“宣告专利权无效的决定,对在宣告专利权无效前人民法院作出并已执行的专利
Over the years, judgments on patent infringement that have been previously made and executed in Article 47 of the Patent Law, which governs the invalidity of the patent right, have been ruled not to have retrospective provisions. There have been various different understanding. This article sorts out the relevant judgments and rulings made by the Supreme People’s Court in the past two years and introduces and interprets the Supreme People’s Court on the relevant interpretation and the latest applicable law as stipulated in Article 47 of the Patent Law. Paragraph 1 of Article 47 of the Patent Law stipulates: ”An invalid patent shall be regarded as invalid from the very beginning.“ Article 47, paragraph 2, stipulates that: ”The decision to declare the patent invalid is invalid, A patent made and enforced by a people’s court before the declaration of the patent right is invalid