回顾2013年—2015年的历史中考题,我们不难发现材料题不仅成为主观题的主要呈现方式,选择题也多得惊人。于是得出结论:没有材料不命题。史料是历史学科的生命,这就为我们的教学提出了一个更高的要求,学生需要具备较高的阅读能力、理解能力、归纳分析和提取信息的能力。这也是新课标的主要理念,也是历史学科与其他学科最主要的区别和独特特征。但随之难题出现:时间紧、任务重,学生不可能课下阅读史料,怎么办?我们的做 Looking back on the 2013-2015 CEAC exams, it is not hard for me to find out that the material questions not only become the main presentation of subjective questions, but also have multiple-choice questions. So come to the conclusion: no material is not proposition. Historical material is the life of history, which puts forward a higher requirement for our teaching. Students need to have a higher ability to read, understand ability, summarize the ability to analyze and extract information. This is also the main idea of ​​the new curriculum standard, but also the most important differences and unique features between the history and other disciplines. But then the puzzle arises: time is tight, heavy tasks, students can not read the historical materials under the class, how do?