论文部分内容阅读
实用分析模式是3种常用的增加报价投标决策方法之一,在投标决策中采用了21种标准,主要标准由决策者主观评定。数据的量化和评估对这些标准来说是特别困难的。以前,莎笛(Saaty),赖夫森(Lifson)和莎菲(Shaifer),还有啊蔓德(Ahmad)和茗克拉赫(Minkarah)的著作习惯于导出简化成近似直线的实用函数解决这样的问题。本投标模式可在标准权重中根据决策者的要求作出不同的决策,还可预定不同的选择转移风险。斟酌主观性的过程,作者认为作为决策工具的实用分析模式是精确的,可支持承包商在投标准备期的决策。
Practical analysis mode is one of three commonly used methods to increase bidding decision-making. 21 kinds of standards are adopted in bidding decision-making, and the main criteria are subjectively evaluated by decision makers. The quantification and evaluation of data is particularly difficult for these standards. Previously, Saaty, Lifson, and Shaffer, as well as Ahmad and Minkarah, were used to deriving practical functions that were reduced to straight lines The problem. The bidding model can make different decisions according to the requirements of decision-makers in the standard weight, and can also be scheduled for different options to transfer risk. Considering the subjective process, the authors consider the practical analytical model as a decision-making tool to be accurate and support the contractor’s decision-making during bid preparation.