论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】商标是一种使用在商品上的标识,标识性是商标最基本的特性;他人出于说明或客观描述商品特点的目的,以善意且必要方式使用注册商标标识,不会导致相关公众将其视为商标而发生来源混淆,构成正当使用;描述性商标无法直接起到区别商品来源的作用,商标权人禁止他人使用的权利范围会受到限制;判断被控侵权人是否构成正当使用,不仅应考虑被控侵权人的主观意图,还要判定其使用是否构成商标意义上的使用;取得注册商标专用权并不意味着权利人有权禁止他人对其商标的一切使用行为,商标权能禁止的只是有可能导致混淆的使用。
The essence of the referee The trademark is a kind of use of the logo on the goods, marking the most basic characteristics of the trademark; others for the purpose of description or objective description of the characteristics of goods, the good faith and necessary way to use the registered trademark logo, will not lead to related The public confused the source as a trademark and constituted a legitimate use. The descriptive trademark could not directly play a role of distinguishing the source of the goods. The range of the right of a trademark owner to forbid others to be used would be limited. Whether the accused infringer constituted a proper use , Not only the subjective intent of the accused infringer should be considered, but also whether the use of the trademark should constitute the use of the trademark. Acquiring the exclusive right of registered trademark does not mean that the right holder has the right to forbid all others to use his trademark. Prohibited is the use that may lead to confusion.