论文部分内容阅读
北京大学教授郑也夫认为,在中国受过12年中小学教育的人,即使进入哈佛、耶鲁等世界名校也不会获诺贝尔奖,因为12年的中小学教育把人修理得已没有了想象力和创造力,只是一个考试机器。(光明网2013年10月8日)郑教授的这番言论可谓一针见血地指出了我国中小学教育的弊病。不过,持有这种观点的不只是郑教授,因为我们的教育把学生变成考试机器,把学生变成考试工具,类似这样的说法早就有。只不过这样的话语从郑教授口里说出来,自然更有影响力.因为这样的话语从教授嘴里说出来更有权威。我们知道,12年的教育本来是要把人培养成全面发展的合格人才,培养成未来的合格公民,培养成有独立自主精神且会创新进步的终身学习者,培养成具有综合能力发展潜质的未来的高层次人才。然而,事与愿违,大量的事实证明,我们通过12年的教育,培养出来的人的显见能力不是这样的,其主要表现出来的能力是学会了应试,而且,我国学生的应试能力可以说是全世界最高的。
Zheng Yefu, a professor at Peking University, believes that even those who have been in primary and secondary education in China for 12 years will not win the Nobel Prize even if they go to Harvard. Because 12 years of primary and secondary education have repaired people without imagination Force and creativity, just a test machine. (Guangming Net October 8, 2013) Professor Zheng’s remarks can be described as sharp-pointed out the shortcomings of our primary and secondary education. However, it is not just Professor Zheng who holds such a view. Because our education turns students into exam machines and students into exam tools, the analogy has long existed. It is only natural that such discourse be said from Professor Cheng because it is more authoritative to say from the professor’s mouth. We know that education for 12 years was originally intended to cultivate people into qualified people of all-round development, cultivate qualified citizens of the future, and cultivate lifelong learners who are independent, innovative and progressive, and will develop into a future with comprehensive capabilities and potential for development. High-level talent. However, contrary to expectations, a large number of facts have proved that we have 12 years of education through cultivating people’s obvious ability is not the case, the main ability to show is to learn the exam, but also, our ability to test students can be said that the world Highest.