论文部分内容阅读
共同正犯采用部分实行全部责任的归责原则,其根据在于共同正犯独特的本质属性。而各学者们结合各自国家或地区刑法典的具体规定,对共同正犯的性质作了不同的解读。虽然我国刑法没有明确规定共同正犯,但理论与实践广泛认可部分实行全部责任的归责原则;而且共同正犯性质的争论,并非不可调和。实际上,共同正犯既具有共同性,也具有正犯性。且二者相辅相成,缺一不可。其共同性强调为他人的实行行为负责,必须是在共同故意范围内;其正犯性则是在共同故意范围内的自己或他人的实行行为。而“误击同伙”案能否适用共同正犯的归责原则,必须从共同性与正犯性两方面加以检视。
The principle of attributive part of total criminal liability is based on the principle of the attribution of common offender’s uniqueness. However, according to the specific provisions of the criminal code in their respective countries or regions, scholars have made different interpretations of the nature of the common offender. Although China’s criminal law does not clearly stipulate a common principal offense, the principle of imputation of partial responsibility for implementing part of the law is widely accepted in both theory and practice. Moreover, the controversy over the nature of a common criminal offense is not irreconcilable. In fact, common offenders have both commonality and positive offenses. And the two complement each other, are indispensable. Its commonality emphasizes that it is responsible for the actions of others and must be within the scope of the common intention; its correctness is the act of oneself or others within the common intentional sphere. However, the principle of attribution to the application of common mistakes should be examined both in terms of commonality and correctness.