论文部分内容阅读
一、绪言因纠纷而生的法律,必然以有效地解决纠纷作为自身存在的正当性基础。所以,一个恰当的法律理论,应当将法律推理——纠纷之法律解决手段,放置在自身理论体系的核心地位。也可以这样说:如果一个有关法律的思考,无法与相应的法律推理理论协调一致的话,那么这种思考很难被视为法律理论的组成部分。纵观法律推理理论的发展历程,套用考夫曼的语式:法律推理的理论史在大的路径上,与司法三段论的历史是一致的。~([1])其典型代表就是形式逻辑
I. INTRODUCTION Laws born out of disputes must inevitably take the dispute as an effective justification for their own existence. Therefore, an appropriate legal theory should put legal reasoning - the means of legal settlement of disputes over its own theoretical system. It can also be said that if a relevant law can not be reconciled with the corresponding theory of legal reasoning, then such thinking can hardly be regarded as an integral part of legal theory. Throughout the course of the development of legal reasoning theory, applying Kaufman’s language style: the theoretical history of legal reasoning is on a large path consistent with the history of the judicial syllogism. ~ ([1]) The typical representative is the formal logic