论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】用人单位按照房改政策将公房出售给劳动者,并与职工签订了购房者服务期限的约定。对于该约定的效力,应审查约定的内容是否违反房改政策和法律规定。对于服务期限的确定,应当遵循合法、公平、平等自愿、协商一致、诚实信用的原则。案号一审:(2005)扬广民一初字第0688号二审:(2007)扬民一终字第0089号[案情]原告:江苏曙光光电有限责任公司。被告:王平。王平于1985年调入曙光光电仪器厂(曙光光电仪器厂2001年底改制后成立江苏曙光光电有限
The main purpose of the referee unit in accordance with the housing reform policy will be sold to the public housing, and workers and workers signed a service contract period. For the effectiveness of the agreement, should review the agreed content is in violation of housing reform policies and legal requirements. For the determination of the term of service, the principle of lawfulness, fairness, equality and voluntariness, consensus, honesty and credibility should be followed. Case No. First Instance: (2005) Yang Guangmian Zi Chu Zi No. 0688 Second instance: (2007) Yang Min Zi Zhong No. 0089 [Case] Plaintiff: Jiangsu Shuguang Photoelectricity Co., Ltd. Defendant: Wang Ping. Wang Ping transferred to Shuguang Optoelectronic Instrument Factory in 1985 (Shuguang Photoelectric Instrument Factory was established in 2001 after the restructuring of Jiangsu Shuguang Photoelectric Co., Ltd.