《新课程标准》倡导:让学生动起来,让语文课堂“活”起来。于是就有人认为:“热闹的课就是好课。”一些教师就在表面上大做文章,一堂课下来,看起来形式新颖,热热闹闹,课上学生非常愉快。可热闹、愉快之后,学生学到了什么?给学生留下了哪些值得回味的东西?仔细想一想,学生该学的知识,该发展的能力鲜有落实。课堂开放了,学生活跃了,这一点是值得肯定和继承的。但一味地追求表面上活跃是不可取的。当然传统的以 “New Curriculum Standards” Advocacy: Let students move up, so that the language class “living ” up. So some people think: “Lively class is a good lesson. ” Some teachers on the surface of a big fuss, a class down, looks new, bustling, class students very happy. Can lively, happy, what did the students learn and what memorable things left for the students? Think carefully about the students’ knowledge of the learning, and the ability to develop is rarely realized. The class is open and the students are active, which is worthy of recognition and succession. However, blind pursuit of seemingly active is not desirable. Of course, traditional