论文部分内容阅读
在我国,商业秘密是通过竞争法获得保护的。《反不正当竞争法》对商业秘密保护问题只是做了原则性规定,但司法实践中的一系列判例实际上已经形成了某些确定化的规则。在路径方面,有合同法法理路径和侵权法法理路径;在程序方面,已经确立了举证责任倒置以及管辖权规则;此外,划定了商业秘密的保护界限。这一对司法实践的归纳,不仅使我们对这一复杂的不正当竞争行为有更加清晰和深刻的认识,更会使这一归纳性认识对司法实践具有指导意义。
In our country, trade secrets are protected by competition law. The Anti-Unfair Competition Law only provides principles for the protection of trade secrets. However, a series of jurisprudence in judicial practice has in fact formed certain definite rules. In the aspect of the route, there is the legal path of the contract law and the jurisprudence of the tort law. In procedural aspects, the burden of proof has been established and the rules of jurisdiction have been established. In addition, the protection limits of commercial secrets have been delineated. This induction of judicial practice not only gives us a clearer and deeper understanding of this complicated act of unfair competition, but also makes this inductive understanding a guiding significance for judicial practice.