去年,在我们地区的语文预考中,有一部分学生将《谋攻》里面的“知己知彼,百战不殆”的“殆”字解释为“失败”,当然,要是意译这句原文,也算不错,但试题的要求是填上与现代汉语相当的词:“危险”(“殆”字的本义),因而失了分。这究竟是个什么原因呢?是因为古文中一词多义的词太复杂,难以掌握吗?不尽然。问题主要在于我们有些教师在解释古文中的 Last year, in our regional language preparatory exams, some students interpreted the word “殆” in “谋知攻, 百不殆” as ““”. Of course, if it were a free translation of this sentence, it would be good, but The requirement of the test questions is to fill in the words equivalent to modern Chinese: “danger” (the original meaning of the word “殆”) and thus lose points. What is the reason for this? It is because the polysemy words in the ancient text are too complicated to grasp? Not necessarily. The main problem is that some of our teachers are interpreting