上海市育才中学的几个学生,对《中国石拱桥》中写的卢沟桥“每个石拱长度不一”发生了怀疑。根据他们的印象,桥上左右石拱是两两对称而并非“长度不一”的。为此他们给作者茅以升写了信。《语文学习》把茅老的复信和同学们的原信一起刊登在第五期的显著地位,编者又特地写了篇《一点启示》的短评。只不过是对一篇课文的一句话,用一封短信提了一个问题,就引起了各方面的重视,甚至大做文 Several students from the Yucai Middle School in Shanghai had doubts about the “every stone arch length of the Lugou Bridge” written in “China Stone Arch Bridge”. According to their impression, the left and right stone arches on the bridge are symmetrical and not “different in length.” To this end, they wrote to the author Mao Yisheng. “Language Learning” put Mao Lao’s letter of reply and the students’ original letter together in a prominent position in the fifth issue. The editor also specifically wrote a short commentary on “a little revelation”. It’s just a sentence of a text, and it raises a question with a short message, which has attracted all kinds of attention and even made a big statement.