看了《广西会计》1990年第二期刊登的何通彦同志的《一稿多投不为错》一文后,笔者认为,一稿多投是错误的。为此,提出如下几点看法:1、“多投等于无投”假设全国共有100个财会刊物,如果每个投稿者都把自己的稿子复印100份投向每个期刊,那么刊物还有什么特色可言呢?既然内容雷同,读者最多只订一份刊物就够了。这样一来,刊物也就必垮无疑了;没有刊物了,哪里还有作者的用武之地呢? After reading the article entitled “More than one manuscript is not voted wrong” by Comrade He Tongyan published in the second issue of “Guangxi Accounting” in 1990, I think it is wrong to make more than one manuscript. To this end, put forward the following views: 1, “multi-vote equal to no vote” Suppose there are a total of 100 accounting publications nationwide, and if each contributor copies 100 copies of his manuscript to each journal, what features do publications have? How about it? Since the content is the same, the reader will only set a maximum of one publication. As a result, the publication will inevitably collapse; there is no publication, where the author’s useless?