论文部分内容阅读
《语文教学与研究》1987年第9期发表了韦志成同志的《评价一堂课的客观标准》一文,对判断一堂课的好坏做出了有益的贡献。“教学目的是否明确”“教学思路是否清楚”“教学效果是否明显”三条标准,作者写得简洁、明了,这不但是评价语文教学,也是评价其它各学科教学的客观标准。大家历年来都是这样进行评价的,是没有什么异议的;只是“学生思维是否活跃”作为评价一堂课的客观标准,而且在韦志成同志的文章中强调得非常突出,就不见得容易为大家所接受了。
In the 9th issue of Chinese Teaching and Research, published in 1987, Comrade Wei Zhicheng’s article “Evaluating Objective Criteria for a Class” made a useful contribution to judging the quality of a class. “The purpose of teaching is clear”, “whether the teaching idea is clear,” “the effect of teaching is obvious,” the three criteria, the author writes concise and clear, this is not only the evaluation of Chinese teaching, but also the objective criteria for evaluating other teaching. Everyone has been evaluating this way over the years. There is no objection; it is just that “students’ thinking is active” as an objective criterion for evaluating a class, and it’s not so easy for everyone to emphasize it very prominently in Comrade Wei’s article. Accepted.