论文部分内容阅读
读与写的关系,是语文教与学中的老话题,也是大家争议了好长时间的话题。读是写的基础,以读为主;读是为写服务的,写来引领读;读是吸收,写是输出等是其要论。中国古代科举取仕,一文定终身,延续了大半个封建社会,后来被一场空前的文化运动给颠覆了。于是来了一个一百八十度的大转折,写从此成了读的附庸,写从此也就因失宠而容颜憔悴。当人们从这场无意与无知造成的噩梦中醒来时,读与写谁是老大的争吵,引得语文界热热闹闹,读有读的道理,写有写的实力。有事实为证:读独领风骚了几十年后,终于在教材中给写留出了不少的空间,但从外在的篇幅上看,似乎读还是略占上风。其实,在笔者看来,这个争论的出发点就是错误的,也就是说这个争论是输在起跑线上的。这个问题的关键是,没有弄清楚阅读与写作各自的内涵与作用是什么,而把两个互为你我的问题,当做一对矛盾来讨论。用一个可能不太确切的比喻,讨论读与写孰轻孰重就好像是讨论丈夫与妻子孰轻孰重般地初级。也许林世程老师并不是什么学术权威,但林老师以他的教学实践感知了这个问题,以“两个来回”这样朴素的表述,一语点破了读与写的关系,这“两个来回”走好了,可能就会撑起一个由读与写共同构筑的充实的言语人生。(妮子)
The relationship between reading and writing is an old topic in Chinese teaching and learning. It is also a topic that we all dispute for a long time. Reading is the basis of writing to read as the main reading is for writing services, writing to lead reading; reading is absorbing, writing is the output is its theory. Chinese ancient imperial exams, a text for life, continued most of the feudal society, was later an unprecedented cultural movement to the subversion. So came a big turning point one hundred and eighty degrees, writing since then has become a vassal of writing, since then also write the result of falling out of favor and haggard. When people woke up from this nightmare caused by unintentional and ignorance, reading and writing who bosses argue, attracted the Chinese community bustling, read and read the truth, write the power of writing. There are facts as evidence: read dominate a few decades later, and finally left a lot of space in the teaching materials to write, but from the external space point of view, it seems that reading or slightly prevail. In fact, in my opinion, the starting point of this debate is wrong, that is to say this argument is lost at the starting line. The crux of the matter is that it is not clear what the respective meanings and roles of reading and writing are. Instead, we discuss the two problems that are you and I, as a contradiction. Using a metaphor that may not be so precise, the discussion of reading and writing is as straightforward as discussing husband and wife. Perhaps Mr.Li Shicheng is not an academic authority, but Mr. Lin perceived this problem with his teaching practice, using the simple expression of “two rounds and rounds,” which simply breaks the relationship between reading and writing. This “two Back and forth, ”Going well, may prop up a fulfilled verbal life constructed by both reading and writing. (Nizi)