“审慎”的洛克直至去世前大约一两周,才终于在遗嘱中承认了自己是《政府论两篇》的作者,这种保守秘密的愿望引人瞩目。施特劳斯以为洛克在书中隐藏了自己的意图,然而洛克并没有隐藏自己的意图,他选择隐藏了自己。查理二世时期的英国风波诡谲,激进的沙夫茨伯里党几近全军覆没,如果没有洛克当初的审慎与坚韧,他就看不到此后的革命成功。问题是,革命成功前的洛克固然“审慎”得有理,此后洛克却“审慎”得不免有些“反常”。为什么坚持到了“光荣革命”之后,《政府论两篇》仍以匿名出版?为什么在议会“虚君共和”的理想已告实现之后,洛克仍然直至临死前才在遗嘱中承认自己就是作者?他的《政府论两篇》到底传达了什么样的信息,以至于它的作者甚或不能见容于“革命政府”?本文通过描述洛克与沙夫茨伯里伯爵、阿尔格农·悉德尼、罗伯特·菲尔默、彭布鲁克伯爵,以及霍布斯等人的错综关系,或可令“双面”洛克那张“隐藏着的激进主义的面孔”浮出水面。 Locke, a “prudent”, did not finally acknowledge himself as the author of “two government articles” in his will until about one or two weeks before his death. This desire to keep secrets is drawing attention. Strauss thought that Locke hid his intentions in the book, but Locke did not hide his intentions, he chose to hide himself. The troubled British crisis in Charlie II’s time and the radical Shaftesbury’s collapse were almost completely annihilated. Without Locke’s prudence and tenacity, he could not see the success of the revolution afterwards. The problem is that before the success of the revolution, Locke certainly “prudent ” reasonable, then Locke “cautious ” inevitably some “anomaly ”. Why persist in “glorious revolution ” after the “government on two articles” still published anonymously? Why in parliament “imaginary kingdom republic ” after the idea has been achieved, Locke still did not recognize in the testament until death Himself is the author? His “Government on two articles” in the end what kind of information is conveyed, so that its author or even can not be content with “revolutionary government”? This article describes the Locke and Shaftesbury Earl, Al Glenn Sidney, Robert Filmer, Earl of Pembrokeshire, Hobbes and others, or the “radicalist face” hidden by Locke, Surfaced