如果说国营企业的颓势根源于其经营活动权贵不清、商品生产者主体地位不明的认识属实,那么,股份化改革不失为一个明智的选择。这种选择的优越之处在于它指出了一种至少是理论上的可能,这就是国家在法律上对企业(以下如无说明均指国营企业)的所有权,并不一定要通过直接控制和干预企业的经营活动来体现,从而有可能以一种“国有”但不“国营”的方式,来改变国家行政部门直接控制企业经营的局面。尽管到目的为止,有关股份化改革思路的表述,似乎都还不足以彻底解决国有企业由企业完全独立经营的问题,但企业从 If the state-owned enterprise’s negative situation is rooted in the fact that its operating activities are unclear and the main reason for the unclear status of commodity producers is true, then the reform of shareholding can be a wise choice. The advantage of this choice is that it points out a possibility at least theoretically, that is, the country’s legal ownership of the company (hereinafter referred to as state-owned enterprises if not stated) does not necessarily have to be directly controlled and intervened. The company’s business activities reflect the situation, so that it is possible to use a “state-owned” but not “state-owned” approach to change the situation in which the state administrative department directly controls business operations. Even though the goal of the idea of ​​reforming the share-based reforms is not enough to completely solve the problem that the state-owned enterprises are completely independent of the enterprise, the company has