论文部分内容阅读
陈辉同志在《档案》1987年第2期上发表一篇新作,名为《从考古新发现看我国档案的起源》(以下简称《起源》),读后颇受启发,但文中存在四个明显的缺陷.现冒昧提出,见教于陈辉同志及档案界对此感兴趣的朋友.《起源》分前后两部分.前一部分主要是对斯大林《马克思主义和语言学问题》中有关论述的理解;后一部分主要是对中国考古新材料的理解.《起源》在论述过程中出现了四个明显的缺陷,
Comrade Chen Hui published a new work titled “The Origins of Chinese Archives from Archaeological Discoveries” (hereinafter referred to as “Origin”) published in Archives No. 2, 1987, which was quite inspired. However, there are four Obvious defects .Positively proposed to see the comrades in the field of Comrade Chen Hui and the archives who are interested in this. “Origin” points before and after the two parts. The first part is mainly on Stalin’s “Marxism and linguistics issues” in the understanding of the discussion ; The latter part is mainly about the understanding of Chinese new archeology material. “Origin” appeared in the exposition process of four obvious defects,