论文部分内容阅读
当代中日两国的司法改革有许多相近之处;同时又存在许多根本差异,例如:改革推进的战略和步骤不同;改革所处的时代背景及社会基础不同;法律家素质及社会法治化程度不同等等。在法律职业化问题上,日本的司法改革给我们的启示是:在追求法官职业化的同时,应该兼顾司法民主化和社会化的理念。本文对照日本法学院的改革方案,具体分析了中国法律专业硕士(JM)的个案,指出JM的设立在借鉴美国法学院制度时,由于没有充分考虑到制度之间的衔接,缺少慎重的论证,导致了资源浪费和不良效果。提出:司法改革方案必须经过全民参与的论证,选择最适宜的路径,避免不必要的损失。
There are many similarities between the judicial reforms in contemporary China and Japan. At the same time, there are many fundamental differences. For example, the strategies and steps for the reform are different. The background and social basis of the reforms are different. The quality of the legalists and the degree of legalization of the society Different and so on. On the issue of legal professionalization, the enlightenment given by Japan’s judicial reform is that while pursuing the professionalization of judges, we should take into consideration the concept of judicial democratization and socialization. Based on the case study of the Japanese law school reform program, this paper analyzes the cases of the Chinese Master of Laws (JM) in detail. It points out that the establishment of JM, which draws lessons from the system of the American law school, Lead to waste of resources and adverse effects. Put forward that the judicial reform program must go through the demonstration of participation of the whole people, select the most appropriate path and avoid unnecessary losses.