论文部分内容阅读
‘歷史教学’一九五五年二月號家昌同志所撰关於高丽和高句丽的解答中關於新羅統一朝鮮半島的原因,家昌同志說是由於新羅的統治者對唐表示忠順。這種說法是和史实不符合的。因為,百濟和高句丽相继为唐所滅後,新羅的統治者文武王金法敏並不是完全對唐朝表示忠順,唐朝也不是很痛快了當地就把高句麗的地方连同百济一齊交給新羅管理。事事上,當六六三年百濟被滅後,唐朝的大軍即行班師回國,只留下極少數的兵卒來鎮守。资治通鑑卷二○一载‘龙朔三年(六六三)九月,…百濟盡平,…詔劉仁轨將兵鎮百濟,召孫仁師、劉仁願還’。於是,新羅就乘机占据百濟舊地。高句丽在六六八年被灭后,高句麗人民由剑牟岑領導發动反唐起義,新羅又反轉身來幫助高句丽對唐兵作戰。在咸亨三年(六七二)十二月,被唐將高侃擊破。资治通鑑卷二○三载‘咸亨三年十二月,高侃與高
History Teaching The reason why Comrade Jia Changchang wrote about Korea and Koguryo in February 1955 about the reunification of the island of Silla and the reunification of the Korean peninsula is that Comrade Chang commented as a result of allegiance to Tang by the rulers of Silla. This statement is inconsistent with the historical facts. Because, Baekje and Goguryeo successively destroyed after the Tang Dynasty, the ruler of Silla King Wenfa King Wenwu is not entirely allegiance to the Tang Dynasty, the Tang Dynasty is not very happy local Goguryeo place with the Baekje along with the management of the Silla . In all events, when the Baekje was destroyed in six or three years, the great army in the Tang Dynasty returned to the country with only a handful of soldiers to guard. Zi Zhi Tong Juan Volume II set containing ’Longshuo three years (six hundred sixty-three) September, ... Baekje flat, ... Chao Liu Ren rail will Bingzhen Baekje, called Sun Ren division, Liu Ren willing to return. So, Silla took the opportunity to occupy Baekje old. After Koguryo was put out in six-six years, the Goguryeo people led by Sword Mucen launched an anti-Tang uprising, and Silla again turned around to help Koguryo fight the Tang soldiers. In Xianheng three years (June 72) December, Tang will be high Kan break. Zhi Zhi Tong Kam volume twenty-three contained ’Xianheng three years in December, Kan and high