我们爱看《稿件评改》专栏。编辑把原稿同修改后发表的稿子同时登出,读者对照着看,原稿中哪些好,哪些罗嗦,对通讯员帮助很具体。《“小两口”种菜记》的修改稿中,将修改的地方一条条加以解释,读者感到很具体,很受启发.原稿调查不够,缺少事实材料,面不够水来凑,以议论代替材料就是水分。编辑改稿时删去了这些空话.这些评语,通讯员看得见摸得着,学得快。《稿件评改》栏是初学写稿者的好老师。 We love to read “manuscript review” column. Edit the manuscript with the revised manuscript published at the same time, the reader with a look, which of the original manuscripts, which wordy, help the correspondent is very specific. In the revised version of “The Young Couple”, he remembers the place where the amendment was made, and readers are very specific and enlightened. The original manuscript is not enough, the facts are lacking, the surface is not enough water, and the discussion replaces the material It is water. Edit these remarks when deleting these empty talk.These comments, correspondents see the tangible, learn fast. Manuscript review column is a good teacher for beginner writers.