论文部分内容阅读
普林斯顿大学东亚系柯马丁教授考察了西周金文书写的作者、撰写、铸刻和字体的问题,指出史和作册官员是金文书写的监督者和表演者,且在西周中后期,以史墙为代表的史官群体已逐步具备了写作的意识,他们领导了一场规范各种场合的礼仪及相应金文格式的运动。在文献分析与借鉴文化人类学理论成果的基础上,柯马丁提出通过这次革新,文字的“公共展示”功能成为周人“文化记忆”与身份认同的主要表达方式,由仪式中的表演而传承,其意义在于塑造周人自身的历史、展望王国的未来。本文旨在结合西方汉学与中国学者对于相关问题的研究,发现中西学者在金文研究的关注点、原材料、出土文献与传世文献的结合等方面的异同,尝试指出柯马丁研究中的可借鉴、商榷之处。
Professor Ke Martin of East Asia Department of Princeton University inspected the writings, writing, engraving and fonts of the Western Jin Dynasty writings. He pointed out that the officials of the History and Book Publishing were the supervisors and performers who wrote the Jinwen writings. In the middle and late Western Zhou Dynasty, The group of historians represented by the wall has gradually become more conscious of writing. They lead a movement that regulates the etiquette and the corresponding Jinwen format on various occasions. Based on the literature analysis and the reference of cultural anthropology theory, Ke Martin proposed to be the main expression of Zhou people “cultural memory ” and identity through the function of “public display ” of the text, In the performance of the heritage, its significance is to shape the Zhou people’s own history, look forward to the future of the kingdom. This article aims to combine Western scholarship and Chinese scholars’ research on related issues and find the similarities and differences between Chinese and Western scholars in the research of Jinwen, the combination of raw materials, unearthed documents and handed down documents, and attempts to point out the similarities and differences in the study of Ke Martin, Discuss the place.