论文部分内容阅读
目的比较不同手术方式治疗鼻中隔偏曲的临床效果。方法选取医院接受手术治疗的鼻中隔偏曲患者150例,按照手术方式分为2组,即鼻内镜组86例与传统组64例。传统组采用传统鼻中隔矫正术,鼻内镜组采用鼻内镜下鼻中隔成形术。比较2组患者切口愈合情况和治愈情况。结果 2组切口愈合情况比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而鼻内镜组治愈率为95.3%,高于传统组的82.8%(P<0.05)。结论与传统鼻中隔矫正术比较,鼻内镜下鼻中隔成形术可有效提高术后治愈率,手术视野清晰、定位准确、创伤小,值得进一步推广应用。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of different surgical methods in the treatment of nasal septum deviation. Methods A total of 150 cases of nasal septal deviation undergoing surgical treatment in our hospital were divided into two groups according to the operation method, that is, 86 cases in the endoscopic group and 64 cases in the traditional group. The traditional group adopted the traditional nasal septum corrective surgery, endoscopic nasal endoscopic nasal septoplasty. The incision healing status and the cure of the two groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference in incision healing between the two groups (P> 0.05). The cure rate of the endoscopic group was 95.3%, which was higher than that of the traditional group (82.8%, P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional nasal septum surgery, nasal endoscopic septoplasty can effectively improve the cure rate, clear surgical field, accurate positioning, less trauma, it is worth further promotion and application.