论文部分内容阅读
利益评价的标准是公共利益优于个人利益。但是以本案为例,如果我们认可被告行为的合法性、不支持原告的诉讼请求,那么被告的行为所产生的社会收益是公共安全的维护和政府定价权威的维护,而其所产生的成本却是对私法原则的破坏和公众对政府司法不公产生的不满和对法律权威性的不信任;如果我们维护消费者的利益、要求被告退还多收的价款,其所产生的收益是公共安全和私法的权威性都得以维护,所产生的成本仅仅是推翻了政府定价的权威性,而这一点对社会并没有什么危害性。依此作出判决、要求被告退还多收的价款当然也更合理、合法。
The standard of evaluation of benefits is that the public interest is superior to personal interests. However, taking the present case as an example, if we recognize the legality of the defendant’s actions and do not support the plaintiff’s claim, the social benefits generated by the defendant’s actions are the maintenance of public safety and the maintenance of government pricing authority. However, the costs incurred It is the destruction of the principle of private law and public dissatisfaction with the unfairness of the government administration and the lack of trust in the authority of law. If we defend the interests of consumers and require the defendant to refund the excessive payment, the proceeds will be public safety and private law The authority is maintained, the cost is only overturned the authority of the government pricing, and this is not harmful to society. Judgments made accordingly, requiring the defendant to refund the overcharged price of course, more reasonable and legitimate.