史传重在翔实,而生动次之。至于耐人寻味,一似非所当务。然而中国史传有不同于西洋者,即文学趣味涵泳其间,有时甚至喧宾夺主是也。世有含蓄其中,寻绎其外的诗意,安得如斯之史传乎?唯中国史传有之。愚以为史实两字的结合,并非注定的必然。文笔一动,便不能不适应作者与读者之审美的需要——华夏文明有此一项,史家也不例外。侧闻有人在希腊 Historically heavy emphasis on informative, but vivid second. As intriguing, it seems like something is wrong. However, Chinese history is different from the Western world, that is, the fun of literature and learning to swim in the midst of it, and sometimes it is overwhelming. The world is subtle, find the poetic outside, the history of Andhra Pradesh? Only Chinese history there. Stupid thought that the combination of the two is not bound to be inevitable. As soon as the writing is over, we can not but adapt to the aesthetic needs of the author and the reader. This is the case of the Chinese civilization, and the historian is no exception. Side heard someone in Greece