学界对“迪昂—蒯因论点”的讨论主要集中在知识论方面,而对其所谈论的判决性实验很少有专门的研究。其实,迪昂—蒯因论点对判决性实验提出了深刻的意见,并为之刻画了精细的结构。本文以迪昂、蒯因本人的言语为线索,以格伦鲍姆、劳丹、魏德肯等人对迪昂—蒯因论点的反驳或辩护为平台,试着展示迪昂—蒯因论点对判决性实验的意见。 The academic discussion of “Dion - Quine’s argument ” mainly focused on the theory of knowledge, and the judgment of the talk about it seldom have specialized research. In fact, Dean - 蒯 due to arguments on the verdict proposed a profound opinion, and for the portrayed the fine structure. In this article, we use Dion and 蒯 as a clue for my own speech, and take Gönbaum, Laudan, Weidken and others as platforms to disprove or disprove Dionne’s arguments, Opinion on the judgment experiment.